The
Ecosystem Classification And Gis Demonstration For Sandakan
By
Flemming T. Hansen
GIS
Specialist
Introduction
This
paper presents the ecosystem classification and demonstrates the use of GIS
using the following examples:
- Examples
of digital maps of Sandakan district
- Examples
of GIS analyses of a few issues related to the Sandakan Coastal Zone Profile.
- Mapping
of natural habitats in Sandakan district.
Digital
maps of Sandakan district
Digital
computer maps are equivalent to traditional paper maps. Digital maps are
produced using a GIS software by which it is possible to perform both simple
and more advanced analyses in a minimum of time.

Fig.1:
Landform map of Sandakan District presented in ArcView GIS. Each colour
represents a unique landform class described in the colour legend to the left
A
number of maps have been produced and presented in the Sandakan Coastal Zone
Profile. A few examples were given to show the maps using the GIS software,
ArcView. These examples included:
- Sandakan
districts boundary including roads and rivers (Department of Forestry)
- Landforms
(Department of Agriculture - KK)
- Soil
suitability (Department of Agriculture - KK)
- Land
use (Department of Agriculture - KK)
- Population
density (Statistical Department - KL)
- Local
Plan 1990
- Sandakan
Town and Environmental Scheme
- Seguntor
Scheme
GIS-analyses
GIS
is a very powerful tool for integrated planning. If the appropriate digital
maps are available it is possible to do rapid analyses identifying areas
susceptible to soil erosion or soil degradation, areas contributing
significantly to siltation of rivers, areas most suitable for rural development
with a minimum of environmental impact etc. In a planning situation it is
possible to consider an unlimited number of issues and get an overview of
benefits and concerns.
A
few examples were given to give an idea on the capabilities a GIS software
provides:
- Identification
of ‘overused land’.
Overused land is defined as areas registered as agricultural land use (land use
data from Department of Agriculture) but regarded as unsuitable for
agricultural purpose (soil data from Department of Agriculture).
- Identification
of areas suitable for agricultural development.
Areas classified as suitable for agricultural purpose (soil data from
department of agriculture) with a population density between 50 and 200
individuals pr. km
2
(data from statistical department). The population density interval was picked
assuming that these areas provide a sufficient social and physical
infrastructure for rural development.
- A
simple ‘integrated’ planning approach.
Considering the distribution of existing forest lands (land use data from
Department of Agriculture) and the distribution of an ecologically important
key species (a fictive orang-utan distribution map) when planning the rural
development in Sandakan district.
- Identifying
erosion susceptible areas.
Erosion susceptible areas are in this example defined as areas with
agricultural land use (land use data from department of agriculture) on
landforms with moderate to steep slopes (soil data from Department of
Agriculture).
- Determining
the population size within a 5-km distance of a major road.
Using GIS functionality (buffer) to determine the total Sandakan population
(data from Statistical Department) within a 5-km distance to all major roads in
Sandakan District. This type of analysis is very useful when evaluating
existing and future infrastructure in a region.

Fig.2:
Areas identified as erosion susceptible areas due to agricultural exploitation
in Sandakan District.

Fig.3:
Population density in a 5 km distance to all major roads in Sandakan District.
Population density is grouped into 5 classes described in the legend to the left.
Natural
habitats
As
part of the ICZM Task Force 4 presented in the Sabah Coastal Zone Profile
report (September 1998) a classification system for the natural habitats of
Sabah Coastal Zone was proposed. This classification system is based on an
existing and proven Wetland classification developed by the US Fish and
Wildlife Service.
|
System
|
Classes
|
|
Marine
|
Continental
shelf
Islands Rock
bottom
Unconsolidated
bottom
Rocky
shore
Aquatic
bed
Reef
|
|
Estuarine
|
Channels Rock
bottom
Unconsolidated
bottom
Rocky
shore
Unconsolidated
shore
Emergent
Wetland
Scrub-scrub
Wetland
Forested
Wetland
|
|
Riverine
|
Channels Rock
bottom
Unconsolidated
bottom
Aquatic
bed
Rocky
Shore
Unconsolidated
shore
Emergent
wetland
|
|
Lacustrine
|
Rock
bottom
Unconsolidated
bottom
Aquatic
bed
Rocky
shore
Unconsolidated
shore
Emergent
Wetland
|
|
Palustrine
|
Emergent
Wetland
Scrub-Scrub
Wetland
Forested
Wetland
|
|
Terrestrial
|
Lowland
forest
|
Table
1: Major classes of the habitat classification system of Sabah Coastal Zone.
The
Department of Forestry has initiated the work of producing a habitat map
covering Sandakan District. The recent work has focused on how to
‘fit’ the existing data available for Sandakan District into the
proposed habitat classification system. The work has been concentrating on data
from the Department of Forestry and the Department of Agriculture, and thus
primarily on the terrestrial and some of the semi-terrestrial habitats. A
complete habitat map will rely on data from other departments that may
contribute with data describing each of major classes shown in Table 1.
The
data available from Departments of Agriculture and Forestry falls into the
following major classes:
|
System
|
Classes
|
Available
data
|
|
Estuarine
|
-emergent
wetlands E3
-forested/scrub-wetlands
E4
|
Mangrove
(Nipah swamps) from Forestry
Mangrove
(all except Nipah) from Forestry.
|
|
Palustrine
|
-emergent
wetland P1
-Scrub/Forest
Wetland P2
|
Floodplains
and/or Freshwater peat swamps from Landform classification (Agricultural depart.)
Floodplains
and/or Freshwater peat swamps from Landform classification (Agricultural depart.)
|
|
Terrestrial
|
-lowland
forest T1
|
Forested
land from Land Use classification (Agricultural depart.)
|
Preliminary
conclusions
- 1) The
mangrove classification from Department of Forestry comprises a number of
mangrove vegetation classes. In the above table there has been no
distinguishing between forested wetlands and scrub wetlands. However the
various vegetation classes may be divided into two classes based on average or
maximum height. Using a general or suitable definition on the difference
between scrub and forests, such classification would be advisable.
- The
Mangrove classification from Department of Forestry covers a large area of
Sandakan District and most of Sabah State. However, areas that are not within
the jurisdiction of the Forestry Department are lacking. The Land Use
classification from Department of Agriculture includes “Marshland and
swamps” which can be used as a supplement to the mangrove classification.
To be able to distinguish between the 3 different wetland classes in the
Estuarine system, land use data need updating by for example using aerial
photographs.
- The
landforms ‘Floodplains’ and ‘Peat swamps’ from the
Landform classification (Department of Agriculture) may be representative of
the Palustrine habitats. However, there is a need to look into the definition
of these classes and perhaps compare them with other information including land
use data, aerial photographs and/or drainage and irrigation data.
- The
terrestrial system only consists of one habitat class within the coastal zone
of Sabah, the lowland forest. Only a minor area of Sandakan District and also
of the whole coastal zone of Sabah falls within the jurisdiction of the
Department of Forestry. Thus the information on forested land from this
department are limited. The land use classification from Department of
Agriculture includes ‘Forested land’ and covers a large part of the
coastal zone of Sabah and Sandakan district and is the best data at present
describing the distribution of forested areas.
- In
general one aspect that is of major ecological relevance when it comes to
describing habitats is their condition or shape. For forested land or for
instance coral reefs there is an urgent need to distinguish between disturbed
and intact habitats. It should be considered whether to incorporate such
classification into the existing classification system.
- In
general, because of the various sources of geographical data, issues including
mapping scale/precision, age of data, mapping criteria etc. have to be
considered carefully when using existing data for habitat classification. Maps
overlap and will reveal areas that can be described with two or more habitat
classes. Most important is to make sure that all relevant information on the
data (sources/scale/age etc) is available and accessible e.g. in the data
dictionary.
- At
present there are no fixed agreement between departments regarding the
availability and accessibility of digital data. This is desirable.
- It
is important to emphasise that any decision making or advising based on maps,
including a natural habitat map, should not be accomplished without some degree
of verification of the reliability of the data. This is done by inspecting the
area of interest and/or studying recent aerial photographs
.